Error on Page

TED: The Economics Daily image
FONT SIZE:Minus Font SizePlus Font Size PRINT: Print

Comparing hourly earnings measures

November 28, 2000

Earnings estimates produced using data from the employer costs for employee compensation program correspond fairly closely to the published average hourly earnings series produced by the Current Employment Statistics (CES) program, particularly among goods-producing workers.

Actual average hourly earnings and employer costs for employee compensation replicate estimates, March 1988- September 1999
[Chart data—TXT]

In a recent BLS analysis, long-term comparisons for the period 1988-99 were made between the actual CES average hourly earnings series and "replicate estimates" constructed with data from the employer costs for employee compensation program. For production workers in goods production (mining, manufacturing, and construction), the replicate estimate was on average 1.5 percent lower than the actual average hourly earnings for this group of workers—about $0.20 per hour lower.

For nonsupervisory workers in the rest of the private nonfarm economy, in contrast, the replicate estimate was on average 5.8 percent higher than the corresponding hourly earnings series—about $0.60 per hour higher.

This analysis uses data from the Current Employment Statistics and Employment Cost Trends programs. Additional information is available from "Replicate estimates of the average hourly earnings series," by Anthony J. Barkume and Michael K. Lettau, Monthly Labor Review, October 2000.

SUGGESTED CITATION

Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, The Economics Daily, Comparing hourly earnings measures on the Internet at http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2000/nov/wk4/art02.htm (visited October 23, 2014).

OF INTEREST

Three recent editions of Spotlight on Statistics

Recommend this page using: