June 28, 2012
In May, five U.S. metropolitan areas recorded jobless rates of at least 15.0 percent, with Yuma, AZ (28.9 percent), and El Centro, CA (26.8 percent), recording the highest rates. Bismarck, ND (2.5 percent), and Fargo, ND-MN (3.0 percent), recorded the lowest unemployment rates among the metropolitan areas.
Forty-five metropolitan areas reported jobless rates of at least 10.0 percent in May, down from 84 areas a year earlier; 140 areas posted rates below 7.0 percent in May 2012, up from 96 areas in May 2011. A total of 215 areas recorded May unemployment rates below the U.S. figure of 7.9 percent (not seasonally adjusted), 153 areas reported rates above it, and 4 areas had rates equal to that of the nation.
In May, 266 metropolitan areas reported over-the-year increases in nonfarm payroll employment, 101 reported decreases, and 5 had no change. The largest over-the-year employment increase occurred in New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA (+107,800), followed by Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX (+88,000), Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA (+63,800), and Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX (+52,600).
These metropolitan area data are not seasonally adjusted and are from the Local Area Unemployment Statistics and Current Employment Statistics (State and Area) programs. May 2012 data from both programs are preliminary and subject to revision. Find out more in "Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment — May 2012" (HTML) (PDF), news release USDL-12-1289.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, The Economics Daily, Metropolitan area employment and unemployment, May 2012 on the Internet at http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2012/ted_20120628.htm (visited July 28, 2015).
New estimates of personal taxes in Consumer Expenditure Survey
In 2013, the Consumer Expenditure Survey improved its personal tax data.
Trends in long-term unemployment
Long-term unemployment reached historically high levels following the recession of 2007–2009.
Housing: before, during, and after the Great Recession
looks at consumer expenditures on household items, employment in residential construction, prices for household items, and injuries in occupations involved in building and maintaining our homes.